ABSTRACT
Background: Different viruses employ similar pathways for replication, revealing key intracellular hotspots to target with host-directed therapies and achieve a broad-spectrum antiviral activity. Plitidepsin is a clinically approved antitumoral agent that blocks the elongation factor eEF1A required for protein translation. This drug counteracts SARS-CoV-2 replication and shows a favorable safety profile in COVID-19 patients. Yet, the precise antiviral mechanism of action of plitidepsin remains unknown. Method(s): Here we used a deep quantitative proteomic analysis to measure the impact of plitidepsin on the proteome of SARS-CoV-2-infected Vero E6 cells. This was complemented with transmission electron microscopy assays, which unraveled the subcellular and morphological changes associated to plitidepsin treatment. In addition, we performed functional in vitro assays to dissect the antiviral activity of plitidepsin against SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses. Result(s): We found that this drug inhibited the synthesis of all SARS-CoV-2 proteins in a dose-dependent manner. These included the R1AB polyproteins, which facilitate the synthesis of non-structural proteins involved in the formation of double membrane vesicles (DMV) required for viral replication. Plitidepsin reduced DMV formation and the morphogenesis of new viruses, having a greater impact on viral than on host proteins. Less than 14% of the cellular proteome was significantly affected by plitidepsin, inducing the up-regulation of key molecules associated with protein biosynthesis, such as the translation initiation factors eIF4A2 and eIF2S3. Therefore, plitidepsin induced a compensatory state that rescued protein translation. This proteostatic response explains how cells preserve the cellular proteome after treatment with a translation inhibitor such as plitidepsin. In addition, it suggests that plitidepsin could inhibit other RNA-dependent and non-integrated DNA viruses, as we confirmed in vitro using Zika virus, Hepatitis C virus replicon and Herpes simplex virus. However, the compensatory proteostasis induced by plitidespin also explains why this drug failed to inhibit the replication of integrated DNA proviruses such as HIV-1. Conclusion(s): Unraveling the mechanism of action of host-directed therapies like plitidepsin is imperative to define the indications and antiviral profile of these compounds. This knowledge will be key to develop broad-spectrum treatments and have them ready to deploy when future pandemic viruses break through.
ABSTRACT
Background: The use of compounds against highly conserved cellular host factors required to complete the replication cycle of distinct viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 offers a common solution to diverse viral threats. This approach is especially relevant for pan-antiviral effects given that viruses converge at intracellular steps such as viral genome replication and protein production. Currently, there are only a limited number of approved drugs involved in targeting intracellular host factors. One of these compounds is plitidiepsin, which has shown a potent preclinical efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 by targeting the host protein eEF1A. Plitidepsin inhibits nucleocapsid viral protein expression and viral induced cytopathic effect in vitro. In addition, it also reduces genomic and subgenomic RNA expression. However, how plitidepsin exerts its antiviral activity remains unknown. Methods: Current models of SARS-CoV-2 replication propose that upon viral fusion, non-structural viral proteins form a replication-transcription complex that associates to compartments with a double membrane vesicle (DMV) morphology that shelters the viral genome replication. Here we have used an electron microcopy analysis to explore the antiviral effect of plitidepsin and its impact on SARS-CoV-2 replication and DMV formation on target Vero E6 cells. Results: This ultrastructural analysis allowed to recapitulate the SARS-CoV-2 infectious life cycle, where evident viral DMV formation was observed as well as viral budding events along with cell-associated viruses. However, in cells treated with plitidepsin at different non-toxic concentrations (0.2 and 0.05 μ M) there was a lack of viral DMV formation and a complete absence of viral particles. Complementary SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and dsRNA immunogold labelling unambiguously confirmed the lack of viral replication in plitidepsin-treated cells. Overall, these data indicate that plitidepsin treatment abrogated the formation of DMVs, and the detection of nucleocapsid or dsRNA viral products. Conclusion: Electron microscopy ultrastructural analysis coupled to immunogold labelling of SARS-CoV-2 products offer a unique approach to understand how antivirals work. This knowledge is key to identify the mechanism of action of promising compounds interfering with host factors whose implication in strategic biological processes can be applied as pan-antiviral strategies.
ABSTRACT
Tec21 is an educational model launched in August 2019 by Tecnologico de Monterrey, in Mexico. As part of students' Exploration stage elective course choices, the School of Engineering and Sciences offered, during the Fall 2020 term, a 5-week course on the topic of Causes, Consequences and Solutions to Climate Change (DS1002B), aimed at students 1) with no previous background or stated interest on the subject and 2) registered in a different school. The objective of this work was to assess the understanding and attitude of non-engineering, second-year undergraduate students toward the climate change crisis after taking the course DS1002B, in which students learn about the basic science of climate change science and acquire the following skills: 1) calculation of greenhouse gases emission inventories, 2) decision making of climate change mitigation and/or adaptation actions, and 3) reflect about the importance of creating awareness about climate change and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the course was implemented online with the participation of270 students divided in 4 groups: 2 Regular-small-local (RSL) groups and 2 Elite- massive-national (EMN) groups, which differed in the number of attending professors, number of students, students' location, and language of instruction. The learning process was assessed in terms of attitude, confidence and source credibility. One of the main findings was that the number of students and language had no impact on learning motivation and attitude towards climate change. Also, a better understanding of the target audience will allow for increased engagement, perception and motivation, leading to more well-rounded future decision makers. © 2021 IEEE.